![fdic-bl.jpg](https://arizent.brightspotcdn.com/dims4/default/481d56b/2147483647/strip/true/crop/750x500+0+0/resize/740x493!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsource-media-brightspot.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com%2Ff6%2F17%2Ff86a8ca941d0bde8514127bc8dd5%2Ffdic-bl.jpg)
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. will likely need to identify staff positions and any programs within the agency not explicitly required by law as part of an
Todd Baker, a senior fellow at the Richman Center for Business, Law & Public Policy at Columbia University and managing principal of Broadmoor Consulting LLC, said the order is likely to drive layoffs.
"It is clearly intended to require most agencies (including the FDIC) to assess whether any specific employee is engaged in activities 'not mandated by statute or other law' and 'not typically designated as essential' by OMB," Baker said.
Pursuant to
The order applies to most agencies, except those tied to national security, public safety, law enforcement, and immigration enforcement. The EO prioritizes reducing staff in offices not explicitly mandated by law — particularly, but not limited to, diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives — as well as identifying roles not deemed essential during funding lapses for cuts.
The order requires the Office of Personnel Management within 30 days to propose new disqualifying factors for federal employment, such as failing to meet legal obligations — including timely tax filing — violating federal employment requirements, refusing nondisclosure commitments, or mishandling government resources.
Agency heads must also report to the Office of Management and Budget on statutory requirements for their agencies and affiliated divisions, evaluating whether any should be eliminated or consolidated — pointing toward potential government restructuring.
Alexandra Barrage, a partner with Troutman Pepper Locke, says the EO is notable in that it includes independent agencies, including the bank regulators like the FDIC.
"The [executive order's] 'agency' definition includes a government corporation," she said. "FDIC is not excepted — so yes, that's how I read it. It doesn't just include executive agencies; it's broader than that."
Baker says the move seems like a precursor to terminating employees deemed not statutorily essential. While the administration has already targeted employees who work in diversity initiatives, Baker says this could affect large swaths of the federal workforce.
"The plan after that is done, presumably, is to fire those employees," Baker said. "The clearest target is DEI-focused employees. The meaning of 'mandated by statute or other law' in the context of a long-established agency is highly uncertain, and could pull in large groups of employees essential to the operation of a successful regulator but not specifically called out by statute."
Barrage says when viewed in tandem with
"I read these [EOs] at the same time I'm reading the Wall Street Journal article from yesterday about the restructuring," she said. "So I feel like now the focus is on the banking agencies, but I can't tell whether this is something they can actually accomplish or not."
The new details come in the wake of a massive scaling back of government operations in the opening weeks of the second Trump administration, with the newly-formed DOGE — led by billionaire entrepreneur and close Trump ally Elon Musk — leading the charge. DOGE was created by a Trump executive order and charged with combing through the federal government to identify and eliminate wasteful spending and "modernizing Federal technology and software to maximize governmental efficiency and productivity."
Another FDIC employee — who asked to remain anonymous — said there is a town hall-style meeting set for Friday at the agency, where employees can ask Acting Chairman Travis Hill questions about the future of work at the agency.
An FDIC spokesperson was unable to verify the meeting and its details by press time.
The Trump administration has already
DOGE employees have also