Patrick Schmid, vice president of The Institutes RiskStream Collaborative, said the process now to provide proof of insurance is not efficient.
“You could have a carrier app and there is potential to have a feature to share digitally that you are insured with another party,” Schmid said. “The idea is that digitization and automation have lessened the burden to fulfill a certificate.”
The Collaborative has also built a blockchain insurance network that includes various
John Fohr, CEO and co-founder of Trustlayer, said the company is working with those insurers and brokers to solve the proof of insurance pain point specifically.
“There is often friction at the beginning of a relationship,” Fohr said. “One or both parties have to validate that there is insurance coverage. It happens all the time in auto loans or mortgages for example. Every time a plumber goes onto a job site, it has to be tracked and validated and it is a manual paper process today. We have a solution that will automate the current legacy, paper-based world.”
Trustlayer announced earlier this month that it had launched a fully digital insurance verification pilot with Great American Insurance Group’s Specialty Equipment Division. The solution uses Robotic Process Automation and artificial intelligence to provide real-time policy information.
“The objective is, as easily as you connect your bank account to something like Venmo, that’s the way we are envisioning the workflow for insurance,” Fohr said. “When you apply for a home loan you can prove coverage right there. When you drive off a lot with a new car, you can prove you have coverage in real-time.”
Despite a general excitement for new technology and the potential of blockchain, some aren’t fully on board.
Jeff Goldberg, head of insurance insights and advisory practices at Aite Novarica Group, said blockchain is irrelevant in traditional insurance.
“Why is this something we can’t do with traditional technologies? When it comes to implementing different approaches the limiting factor is rarely technology, it is insurance, the agents, the companies,” Goldberg said. “Does blockchain fix that problem, no. In order to leverage blockchain you have to have a company agree to the approach.”
Goldberg said he understands the use of
“Most insurers aren’t automated, so if you automate the insurance verification with blockchain but you haven’t automated getting insurance, have you really helped somebody?” Goldberg asked. He added that he knows he is being short-sighted and thinking small. He acknowledges the potential use and value of digital proof of insurance but he is skeptical.
“Blockchain is a tech platform that you would use to implement data exchanges and information exchanges, that’s great,” Goldberg said. He suggests, however, that the real value of the RiskStream Consortium isn’t in the
“Getting the insurance industry to talk to each other better and in a more standardized way will have a huge value for everyone,” he said. “The important part is the automation, not the blockchain.”
